Exploring the application of the think aloud and stimulated recall procedures

María del Carmen Gómez-Pezuela Reyes, María Virginia Mercau

Resumen


This article will narrate the experience of two researchers new to applying two qualitative research procedures in their PhD studies. The first one is called think aloud (TA), an introspective technique that retrieves what is concurrently happening in the mind of the participant while performing a cognitive activity. The second one is called stimulated recall (SR), a retrospective method used to register the cognitive activity after a task has been done. The studies will show the possibilities, challenges and limitations of these procedures, as well as the considerations both researchers went through in their respective research fields.

 


Palabras clave


introspective techniques; retrospective techniques; qualitative research; methodology; application.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referencias


Barnard, Roger and Ann Burns (eds.) (2012), Researching Language Teacher Cognition and Practice International Case Studies, Bristol, Multilingual Matters.

Block, Ellen (1986), “The comprehension strategies of second language readers,” in TESOL quarterly, vol. 20, no. 3, September, pp. 463-494.

Brandt, Deborah (1990), Literacy as Involvement: The Acts of Writers, Readers, and Texts, Carbondale, Southern Illinois University Press.

Calderhead, James (1981), “Stimulated recall: a method for research on teachers,” in British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 211-217.

Dempsey, Nicholas (2010), “Stimulated recall interviews in ethnography,” in Qualitative Sociology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 349-367.

Gass, Susan and Alison Mackey (2000), Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research, New York, Routledge.

Hobbs, Valerie and Magdalena Kubanyiova (2008), “The challenges of researching language teachers: What research manuals don’t tell us,” in Language Teaching Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 495-513.

Hosenfeld, Carol (1977), “A preliminary investigation of the reading strategies of successful and nonsuccessful second language learners,” in System, vol. 5, no. 2, May, pp. 110-123.

Kucan, Linda and Isabel Beck (1997), “Thinking aloud and reading comprehension research: inquiry, instruction, and social interaction,” in Review of Educational Research, vol. 67, no. 3, autumn, pp. 271-299.

Lyle, John (2003), “Stimulated recall: a report on its use in naturalistic research,” in British Educational Research Journal, vol. 29, no. 6, December, pp. 861-878.

Moore, DeWayne and Karen Zabrucky (1989), “Verbal reports as measures of comprehension evaluation,” in Journal of Reading Behavior, vol. 21, no. 3, September, pp. 295-307.

Newell, Allen and Herbert Simon (1972), Human Problem Solving, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.

Ryan, Jonathon and Susan Gass (2012), “Stimulated recall,” in Roger Barnard and Ann Burns (eds.), Researching Language Teacher Cognition and Practice International Case Studies, Bristol, Multilingual Matters, pp. 144-161.

Takako, Egi (2008), “Investigating stimulated recall as a cognitive measure: reactivity and verbal reports in SLA research methodology,” in Language Awareness, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 212–228.

van Someren, Maarten, Yvonne Barnard, and Jacobijn Sandberg (1994), The Think Aloud Method. A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes, London, Academic Press.


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.